On Sun, Feb 23, 2003 at 03:16:30PM -0800, Chuq Von Rospach wrote:
> On Sunday, February 23, 2003, at 02:44 PM, Rich Kulawiec wrote:
> >It *is* illegal in 27 states and a number of countries, so far.
> arguable, unless both sides involved live in that jurisdiction.
> State-based spam legislation hurts the cause, it doesn't help it.
Hey, I didn't say I was in *favor* of this: I'm on the record, thus far,
as being opposed to anti-spam legislation. (Why? Because (a) I think
the Internet community can deal/is dealing with this problem and (b) any
such legislation will be poisoned by pro-spam lobbyists like the DMA.)
I'm just pointing out that the statutes are on the books.
[Please *do not* CC me on replies to messages on this mailing list. Thanks.]