Great Circle Associates List-Managers
(May 2001)
 

Indexed By Date: [Previous] [Next] Indexed By Thread: [Previous] [Next]

Subject: Re: protecting archives from harvesters (was test messages)
From: JC Dill <inet-list @ vo . cnchost . com>
Date: Tue, 29 May 2001 10:44:51 -0700
To: list-managers @ GreatCircle . COM
In-reply-to: <200105290448 . f4T4mIh12130 @ plaidworks . com>
References: <5 . 0 . 0 . 25 . 2 . 20010528203807 . 03637cf0 @ pop3 . vo . cnchost . com>

On 09:56 PM 5/28/01, Chuq Von Rospach wrote:
>
>On Monday, May 28, 2001, at 08:39 PM, JC Dill wrote:
>
>> Do you remember the following post?  I found it to be quite
>> interesting, and marked it as "important" in my list archives.  I'm
>> curious if/why you find this approach to be unacceptable.
>
>I don't remember it, but I've thought about it myself, and simply
>haven't had time to try implementing it. I think it's a nice approach,
>although one reason I haven't done it is because of the case where
>someone has a direct URL into the archives (like I posted yesterday into
>mine); I haven't found a way to cleanly intercept that, authenticate,
>adn then take them back where they wanted to go in the first place, at
>least not without more work than I've had time for.

I think there's a server hack that would prevent the archive page from being displayed/linkable except through the form button. Can't remember how, though.

jc




References:
Indexed By Date Previous: Re: protecting archives from harvesters (was test messages)
From: Aumont <serge . aumont @ cru . fr>
Next: Re: test messages etc
From: Nick Simicich <njs @ scifi . squawk . com>
Indexed By Thread Previous: Re: protecting archives from harvesters (was test messages)
From: Chuq Von Rospach <chuqui @ plaidworks . com>
Next: Re: protecting archives from harvesters (was test messages)
From: Tim Pierce <twp @ rootsweb . com>

Google
 
Search Internet Search www.greatcircle.com