Great Circle Associates List-Managers
(May 1999)
 

Indexed By Date: [Previous] [Next] Indexed By Thread: [Previous] [Next]

Subject: Re: When lawyers run the internet
From: Paul Hoffman / IMC <paulh @ imc . org>
Date: Sat, 01 May 1999 10:26:46 -0700
To: Chuq Von Rospach <chuqui @ plaidworks . com>, list-managers @ GreatCircle . COM
In-reply-to: <v04204e1bb3503c46af8a @ plaidworks . com>
References: <199904302309 . TAA27330 @ sunspot . tiac . net> <199904302309 . TAA27330 @ sunspot . tiac . net>

At 10:08 PM 4/30/99 -0700, Chuq Von Rospach wrote:
But I don't worry about it. but it IS, I think, another argument FOR mail-back validation, because you have a nice proof that it wasn't unsolicited or forged.

Good point, but who keeps those around? Is a few lines (which doesn't include the "auth" part) in the Majordomo log good enough to "prove" validation?

--Paul Hoffman, Director
--Internet Mail Consortium


Follow-Ups:
Indexed By Date Previous:
From: (nil)
Next: Re: When lawyers run the internet
From: Chuq Von Rospach <chuqui @ plaidworks . com>
Indexed By Thread Previous:
From: (nil)
Next: Re: When lawyers run the internet
From: Chuq Von Rospach <chuqui @ plaidworks . com>

Google
 
Search Internet Search www.greatcircle.com