Great Circle Associates List-Managers
(December 1997)

Indexed By Date: [Previous] [Next] Indexed By Thread: [Previous] [Next]

Subject: Re: Clueless subscribers?
From: Mitch Collinsworth <mkc @ Graphics . Cornell . EDU>
Date: Wed, 03 Dec 1997 14:57:52 -0500
To: List-Managers @ GreatCircle . COM
In-reply-to: Your message of "Wed, 03 Dec 1997 11:55:04 MST." <v04002820b0ab5af1b4c3 @ [207 . 34 . 64 . 181]>

>>Oh great.  There are too many different uns*b mechanisms out there and
>>people are getting being confused by it, so your solution is to invent
>>yet another one.  Yah, I follow that logic.  (not)
>It's not a new method - I've seen it used successfully by a number of lists
>(I'm on a few lists, one of which has been using it for more than a couple


My apologies then.  I guess "new" is relative.  Am I the only net fossil
who's not run into before?


                     "Families can't trust Disney"

Indexed By Date Previous: Re: Clueless subscribers?
From: jtlist @ pigsfly . com (Jerry Trowbridge)
Next: Re: Uns*b mechanisms (was: Clueless subscribers?)
From: David Lundell <delundel @ netguide . com>
Indexed By Thread Previous: Re: Clueless subscribers?
From: Grant Neufeld <grant @ achilles . net>
Next: Re: Clueless subscribers?
From: claire @ siberia . demon . co . uk (Claire McNab)

Search Internet Search