Great Circle Associates Firewalls
(February 1994)
 

Indexed By Date: [Previous] [Next] Indexed By Thread: [Previous] [Next]

Subject: Re: Crack'ified npasswd
From: Brad Huntting <huntting @ advtech . uswest . com>
Date: Sat, 12 Feb 1994 22:10:40 -0700
To: "Paul Pomes" <paul @ uxc . cso . uiuc . edu>
Cc: Firewalls @ greatcircle . com
In-reply-to: Your message of "Sat, 12 Feb 1994 18:05:47 CST." <22119 . 761097964 @ uxc . cso . uiuc . edu>

> If my experience with folding CrackLib-2.5 into the CSO Nameserver package
> is any guide, adding the Crack rules makes a password checker too strict with
> insufficient feedback to the user.

This version of npasswd_boulder is pretty verbose when it rejects
a password.


brad


References:
Indexed By Date Previous: Re: Can you print from a chroot'd process?
From: Icarus Sparry <I . Sparry @ ss1 . bath . ac . uk>
Next: [no subject]
From: Morten Hermanrud <Morten . Hermanrud @ ibmuio . uio . no>
Indexed By Thread Previous: Re: Crack'ified npasswd
From: "Paul Pomes" <paul @ uxc . cso . uiuc . edu>
Next: Re: Crack'ified npasswd
From: morgan @ engr . uky . edu (Wes Morgan)

Google
 
Search Internet Search www.greatcircle.com